You are reading a single comment by @Fox and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Er, yeah. Just saw that but valid criticism. This is the best we've got though presumably.
I didn't mean that in a 'having a go at Corbyn' kind of way by the way, I just think it would be a real shame to presume the result happened because of poor disenfranchised people when the evidence available doesn't support it. It seems a lot more complex than that.
Fox
Chalfie
is he wrong?
I'm not on the "nothing jeremy says is wrong" tip here.
I'm on the "do you trust this poll? given all the fucking polls EVER in the last year seem to be so out of fucking wack, how can you believe this poll of ~25000 people is properly representative (i.e. adequately sized, sufficiently powered, randomly constructed blah de fucking blahed) of a nation of, what, 300 mill?"