You are reading a single comment by @marcom and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I get that the whole topic is more complicated.

    But this additional levy is pretty simple. It is about protecting the health of people in London due to a specific pollution problem that has not been met.

    The argument about the poor is weak imo. 2mins on auto trader....

    2007
    50k
    MPV
    1.6l petrol
    <£400
    autotrader.co.uk/classified/a­dvert/201608297245816?tech=1

    The real cost of a car is the running cost; fuel, insurance, servicing, etc.

    Also marcom, if poor people have to clean rich peoples' toilets that is a situation that exists independent to an emissions charge. While I don't have the data, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it's unlikely that the cleaner of a Bugatti owner in London is going to be driving to work.

  • You're still missing the point. And the reduction of pollution will be so minimal that no one of the central Londoners will be able to go out and having the feeling of breathing in the garden of a Spa on Mont Ventoux while checking on their smart phones the last topic on a social network.

  • You're still missing the point.

    Maybe it's not being made adequately clearly?

About

Avatar for marcom @marcom started