-
Follow that logic, however, and it's hard to see why pushing your bike wouldn't also fall within the term 'lead or drive any horse, ass, sheep, mule, swine, or cattle or carriage of any description' given that a bike is a carriage. And if that's the case then it's illegal to push your bike along the pavement...
-
Don't want to get into the armchair lawyering (especially with a lawyer) but isn't that covered by the full wording of s72 of the Highway Act 1835:-
“If any person shall wilfully ride upon any footpath or causeway by the side of any road made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers; or shall wilfully lead or drive any horse, ass, sheep, mule, swine, or cattle or carriage of any description, or any truck or sledge, upon any such footpath or causeway; or shall tether any horse, ass, mule, swine, or cattle, on any highway, so as to suffer or permit the tethered animal to be thereon.”
One would assume that riding a bike is covered by either the 'ride' part or the 'drive' part of the second clause. But pushing a bike along the footway is neither 'ride', 'drive' or 'lead'.
The law for red lights and stop lines specifically mentions 'propel a vehicle' over the stop line, but s72 of the Highway Act doesn't use 'propel'.
-
My old man, now dead, told me many years ago that pushing a bike the wrong way up a one way street was illegal. I think he was talking specifically about during the war to avoid obstructing the pavement during air-raid running away drills. IF that was in fact true, bearing in mind he did have dementia, then it is feasible that at some stage "avoiding" a red by walking around it could also have been an offence. I can't see any cop bothering his/her arse to do anyone for it as long as no inconvenience is caused to anyone else.
Why is propel vague?
If you walk your bike are you not propelling it?
Even if you ghosty it and run across next to it you've still propelled it.