-
This trial by public is still detracting from the discussion of widespread state sponsored doping in Russia.
Is it? If anything, the state sponsored doxing actually keeps the state sponsored doping in the limelight for longer, since the former is clearly the Kremlin's clumsy attempt to retaliate over the discovery of the latter.
Schneier drew attention to the insertion of fake documents among doxing releases by Russia a month ago, although in the Bear Fanciers case I'm not sure what purpose would be served by so doing. The actual data is quite a small set and relatively easy to check. A really clever hack would have changed the master records too.
There might be transcription errors, but from the few TUEs I've seen from the leak, it seems that the original documents are pretty sloppy to start with
You are reading a single comment by @gbj_tester and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
gbj_tester
Damned if they do and if they don't though.
"This illegally obtained private medical data is in accurate. This is my actual private medical data."
or
"This private information was obtained illegally and I am unwilling to discuss it."
Either of those answers to any journalist can be taken the wrong way. Lose/Lose situation.
This trial by public is still detracting from the discussion of widespread state sponsored doping in Russia.