Don't assume your inference is de-facto the implication of what I said. I posted six words and you started making assumptions. If you can't see the difference between my post (and my subsequent explanation of it) and your interpretation of it, then that's your problem.
Me "It isn't inherently racist to want to regulate immigration"
You "But it's a pretty reliable barometer."
You implied that people who WANT TO REGULATE immigration are most likely racist. Maybe you didn't intend do, but that's the implication.
I thought my analogy was highly original, no?