You are reading a single comment by @The_Kindness_of_Trees and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Indeed I did suggest, and thanks for explaining what that means, really helpful. But I didn't suggest a "racist agenda", I implied, to use your helpful terminology, that people who don't like immigration often have racist views, however they may manifest themselves.

    And fuck off with your cliched analogy, I stand by my original post. I was querying your pompous attempts to put words in my mouth.

    Like I said, maybe I touched a raw nerve for you.

  • Me "It isn't inherently racist to want to regulate immigration"

    You "But it's a pretty reliable barometer."

    You implied that people who WANT TO REGULATE immigration are most likely racist. Maybe you didn't intend do, but that's the implication.

    I thought my analogy was highly original, no?

  • Don't assume your inference is de-facto the implication of what I said. I posted six words and you started making assumptions. If you can't see the difference between my post (and my subsequent explanation of it) and your interpretation of it, then that's your problem.