You are reading a single comment by @JWestland and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
It's true that for some people in deprived areas the army can give them opportunities they otherwise don't get.
But isn't the issue then that there are no opportunities?
Why does the UK gov keep pushing the army as heroic, yet injured veterans have to fight for help sometimes? [see also the USA btw]That just doesn't sit well with me.
JWestland
I'm not sure where that stat has come from but I'm pretty sure that troops under 18 are not deployed on the frontline so it seems a bit unlikely.
Personally I know a fair few people from school (all boys comp in a fairly disadvantaged industrial town) who went into the army and came out having developed as a person much more than if they'd stayed in the same town doing some crap (or more likely no) jobs.
I don't agree with recruiting at 16 but you do need the parent's permission as well. Also another two years of forced education isn't necessarily going to benefit everyone (although I'd suggest apprenticeships would be more beneficial).