You are reading a single comment by @gbj_tester and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • It's not even a grey area. Did Wiggins require that particular steroid at that time?

    In the interview he even admitted it was preventative - this is outwith the rules.

  • In the interview he even admitted it was preventative - this is outwith the rules.

    [citation needed]

    Most medication for chronic illness is not to make it better but to stop it getting worse. In other words, it's preventative. Prophylaxis is a normal part of chronic disease management. Sir Bradley's TUE passes the first test once he has established that he has a chronic medical condition and that the substance is an appropriate treatment.

    There are question marks over the second and third tests, but the TUEC thought they had been passed.

  • There are question marks over the second and third tests, but the TUEC thought they had been passed.

    What questions?

  • Sir Bradley's TUE passes the first test once he has established that he has a chronic medical condition and that the substance is an appropriate treatment.

    Except it's not (an appropriate treatment). Lots of people suffer with hayfever, if intramuscular injections fixed it we'd all be rushing out to get them. He still hasn't provided any justification for the intramuscular injection element so the Marr interview hasn't changed my view at all: within the letter, but not within the spirit.

About

Avatar for gbj_tester @gbj_tester started