Didn't he already say he wouldn't be doing anything because they've already spent so much money (sunk cost fallacy)? Is he calling for more money to be spent despite this?
Is this a good thing? I hope it's a good thing.
The goals (in particular: "To set out any lessons that should be learnt in order to improve the conduct of potential and approved projects in the future") don't leave me that hopeful, however.
I think the issue was less sunk costs, more that they were tied into contracts where the cancellation fee didn't make it worth stopping the project. I guess they may well be looking for a way out of that
Someone who's following this closer than I've been: https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/review-to-be-conducted-into-garden-bridge-project
Didn't he already say he wouldn't be doing anything because they've already spent so much money (sunk cost fallacy)? Is he calling for more money to be spent despite this?
Is this a good thing? I hope it's a good thing.
The goals (in particular: "To set out any lessons that should be learnt in order to improve the conduct of potential and approved projects in the future") don't leave me that hopeful, however.