You are reading a single comment by @andyp and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Someone who's following this closer than I've been: https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/review-to-be-conducted-into-garden-bridge-project

    Didn't he already say he wouldn't be doing anything because they've already spent so much money (sunk cost fallacy)? Is he calling for more money to be spent despite this?

    Is this a good thing? I hope it's a good thing.

    The goals (in particular: "To set out any lessons that should be learnt in order to improve the conduct of potential and approved projects in the future") don't leave me that hopeful, however.

  • Is this a good thing? I hope it's a good thing.

    My reading of the situation is that he wants to cancel the project, but is putting together a watertight case to do so. There's this, plus the National Audit Office and the Charities Commission all looking at aspects of the project. I'm fairly certain they'll find enough dirt around the procurement process to justify it's cancellation.

  • Cool - despite being a pretty dumb idea, I agree with you - finding dirt shouldn't be too hard as the entire thing reeks.

  • My reading of the situation is that he wants to cancel the project

    That would be some rare good news.

About

Avatar for andyp @andyp started