You are reading a single comment by @vulpinecc and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • It's pretty unusual, across industry. But we're talking the factory. Today, weirdly. Factories hate other sizes. They have to cut new pattern and CAD again. But it's definitely of interest. Touch wood we can.

  • Longer arms in womens stuff would be good too, although I appreciate I have longer-than-average arms.

    I love some vulpine stuff and wear it all the time, other stuff doesn't work at all and I send it back, the frustrating third category is stuff I almost like, or I like and it almost fits, but doesn't quite work or quite fit. But, I'm sure other people love those things too. I'm annoyingly between sizes, and there's quite a jump, but as time goes on I'm moving more decidedly up into L rather than M...

    One thing I'm curious about: I have a pair of well-worn womens cotton rain trousers (a few years old), and I thought I'd add another colour in the recent sale only to find that the "updated cut" means that the lower leg has gone so skinny I can't comfortably get the things on, let alone bend at the knee. Knee circumference has gone from approx. 46cm to 40cm. On a size large. I don't think I have particularly hefty calves, certainly not for a cyclist, so I find it hard to believe this isn't a common issue?! Has the updated cut been a success?

About

Avatar for vulpinecc @vulpinecc started