You are reading a single comment by @larsenroad and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Super
-
I don't believe that's a 52t. Appears to be the same chainring as the previous image they sent/you posted. Reckon that's a 49 or 50t.
Photo from this post (https://www.lfgss.com/comments/13176017/) is with a 53t and shows a greater distance from tip of spider to teeth than that... 1t smaller but surely the spider-to-teeth gap should be greater than shown with a 52?
Thuekr
Lukas
@larsenroad
Here is a new picture from them with a 52T.
1 Attachment