-
• #97652
yes
-
• #97653
it is fucking ugly, a stupid bro-pro, spoke cards, ludicrous mudguard, spacers above stem, nds picture...
-
• #97654
it belongs on the reader's wives anti porn thread
-
• #97655
excuse professor, i'll do my best to remedy hahahah
-
• #97656
excuse professor
Consider yourself fortunate that DJ got here before me
-
• #97657
What is that thing on the fork? is that supposed to be a front spoiler or something?
Current project/anti thread is that way----- >>
-
• #97658
Maybe you can tell him to gau away.
-
• #97659
Maybe you can tell him to gau away.
To be honest, the bike is pretty gaudy.
-
• #97660
Boring homogenised nothingness and vain
-
• #97661
Having read these last comments, I think I got off quite lightly with my stem pics from yesterday... thank you for your kindness people.... keep on cycling...
-
• #97662
from my recollection of meeting, you're a nice fella , as well as arguably one of londons cycling/visual 'icons' , so you get a bligh
-
• #97663
you have changed the photo, but still far from porn - spacers, stickers, valves not aligned with logos, mismatched tyres...
-
• #97664
Half carpet half wood? Ugh..
Also the thing on the downtube is UCI illegal
-
• #97665
1970's ritchey track with usa - fuck yeah paint job
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1249599425072642&set=pcb.317976501880437&type=3&theater
-
• #97666
This Olympics has some porny track bikes in it.
-
• #97667
coughs
-
• #97668
*The only sirveylo I will ever be posting in here.
-
• #97669
*Apart from @germanmarc 's T1.
-
• #97670
coughs
Even better in actual Rio build with aero cranks and dinner plate chainrings
-
• #97671
The rear wheels are too much bling though.
-
• #97672
Yes, but they're a lot rounder than other wheels.
-
• #97673
...and rider? G.O.L.D. :o)
-
• #97674
That's a great photo
-
• #97675
what?