-
I wouldn't class myself as a conspiracy theorist but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a close run state as with Bush/Gore and there was some fiddling to allow Clinton to take it.
(not to say I actually believe the election will be rigged though)
I think that the pre-emptive vote rigging alligation is twofold; 1) it reinforces Clinton's image as establishment / corrupt / etc. 2) if it is close then it gives wiggle room to contest those states, which in turn may enable a re-vote... which may push people to vote for him.
Originally I thought Trump would disappear, then I thought he may win, until very recently I've actually been convinced he will take it.
Luckily this article has given me some hope:
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/with-only-90-days-until-the-election-trumps-steady-decline-in-the-polls-means-he-needs-a-miracle-to-win -
Trump's brand of post truth and his willingness to suggest without saying are making this intresting enough for another politics tab.
Hints at assassination are really extreme but it feels like it is becoming a new norm. His supports just shrug it off as a wilful misinterpretation by the Clinton campaign/mainstream media.
Really interesting tho is this building of the idea that if Trump doesn't win then the election is illegitimate. Where are they going with this. Is this as extreme as the Trump team knowing they wont win and looking at other avenues to take power or are they just simply throwing another cat on the table.
Roger Stone, an informal adviser to the Trump campaign, implied last month to internet agitator Milo Yiannopoulos that the notion of discrediting the election as “illegitimate” is part of Trump’s campaign strategy.
“I think we have widespread voter fraud, but the first thing that Trump needs to do is begin talking about it constantly,” Stone said. “He needs to say for example, today would be a perfect example: ‘I am leading in Florida. The polls all show it. If I lose Florida, we will know that there’s voter fraud. If there’s voter fraud, this election will be illegitimate, the election of the winner will be illegitimate, we will have a constitutional crisis, widespread civil disobedience, and the government will no longer be the government.’”
“If you can’t have an honest election, nothing else counts,” Stone continued. “I think he’s gotta put them on notice that their inauguration will be a rhetorical, and when I mean civil disobedience, not violence, but it will be a bloodbath. The government will be shut down if they attempt to steal this and swear Hillary in. No, we will not stand for it. We will not stand for it.”
(link)
First post. Interesting read at these times. How things haven't changed.
Trump's brand of post truth and his willingness to suggest without saying are making this intresting enough for another politics tab.
Hints at assassination are really extreme but it feels like it is becoming a new norm. His supports just shrug it off as a wilful misinterpretation by the Clinton campaign/mainstream media.
Really interesting tho is this building of the idea that if Trump doesn't win then the election is illegitimate. Where are they going with this. Is this as extreme as the Trump team knowing they wont win and looking at other avenues to take power or are they just simply throwing another cat on the table.
(link)