The problem with the Lance comparisons is that it's exactly the same thing a clean athlete would say too. It's SO HARD to prove a negative - they've got the tests, they've got the bio passports, and beyond that, what can they do? (not missing three fucking tests would help I suppose)
Froome's had people compare him to armstrong too, for denying doping by saying he's tested a lot. From a clean athlete's point of view - if people don't believe the tests, what's the point of fucking with their lives doing all this testing then? It's the only 'proof' they have.
The problem with the Lance comparisons is that it's exactly the same thing a clean athlete would say too. It's SO HARD to prove a negative - they've got the tests, they've got the bio passports, and beyond that, what can they do? (not missing three fucking tests would help I suppose)
Froome's had people compare him to armstrong too, for denying doping by saying he's tested a lot. From a clean athlete's point of view - if people don't believe the tests, what's the point of fucking with their lives doing all this testing then? It's the only 'proof' they have.