• I got cramp at pretty much exactly the point on the chart where my max power (X) over duration (Y) starts to overtake the best of the year to date. I need to go harder on long training rides and do events within the limits found in training. Not sure if that is similar with you.

  • What you do is you look at it, go "this is interesting", then never look at it again.

  • Ha! I would say it would be like 'Ho you're riding out of your FTP comfort zone..so what! FUCK IT!!!!'

    Pretty much all my rides and races!

  • Normalized power only 211, try harder next time.

  • The difference in our average speed vs average power makes me think I should lose some weight/work on my aero's. Only 4kg difference but an average ride is at least the same weighted, but for a lot less speed.


    1 Attachment

    • Screen Shot 2016-08-01 at 22.34.15.png
  • Ok...


    1 Attachment

    • image.jpeg
  • I think for me I think I should have stretched (to lessen the chance of cramps) and do more training on endurance at a higher FTP (whatever that will be) to get comfortable to be riding at a painful zone.

  • get comfortable to be riding at a painful zone

    an @eyebrows enters the room

  • get comfortable to be riding at a painful zone.

    Ho, meet over/unders. Under/overs, meet Ho.

    You'll both get on like a house on fire.

  • I've been using a power meter for a couple of years but not really 'using' it, I just like the extra strava info. I fucking hate FTP tests though as they're a bugger to do outside, and I can't handle a turbo in the summer, so haven't done one in ages. Thankfully Strava estimates it, and it seems to be creeping up very slowly, it's 30w on last year but I think that may just be from changing power meters... I mostly use mine for pacing on hills, and keeping my spirits up when riding into a headwind (which are constant around the Vale of York).

    What little 'training' I do do, however, is made massively easier by having a PM - e.g. 20/40s, Russian steps, over/unders as ^.

  • I'm ~7kg heavier than you Ho, averaged 184 watts for the event, and was 2 minutes slower overall.

    Basically I'm fatter*, which is where my additional power turned into a slower time.

    Entertainingly I averaged 196 watts for last year, and was a minute slower. I did take a long and frankly extremely satisfying piss each year and have no data on how long they took, so that might account for that.

    *Larger frontal area

  • All this average speed malarky isn't comparable as its a group event and I'm guessing you all spent different amounts of time sitting in the middle of a bunch.

  • It's those fucking aeros then, the bastards.
    Looking back at last weeks Sunday ride bit windy, but tailwind on the way back - ave 181, weighted 214 and yet... 17.9mph over 100k/2,900ft of climbing.

    Edit: As @hovis rightfully pointed out - club runs are a lot lower power, similar speed. I'm say here assuming that you both smashed it round on your own, which seems unlikely now I come to think of it.

  • FTP and comfort are not words I'd use in the same sentence.

  • I was shameless when it came to taking a wheel when I was tired, equally I pulled at the front when I could- however Hovis is quite correct in pointing out that we have no way of normalising for drafting.

  • Isn't that what weighted/normalised is meant to do though? Strava: " It is our best guess at your average power if you rode at the exact same wattage the entire ride." Presumably that's how the Coggan formula works as well?

  • Dunno, NP for me was 221 watts for the ride, against an FTP of 260. I have no idea if that FTP is accurate having not tested for six months, however. It's likely high if anything. I barely ride a bike these days.

  • This is a very good point. In my last rod crit I finished about 12th but had around 50 watts less on average than a couple of people I beat because I spent the whole race coasting in the bunch.

  • I don't know how much to trust NP at all really, particularly the Coggan formula which often puts it at just shy of my FTP for a long Sunday ride which doesn't make sense. It may just be that my FTP figure is low because I'm lazy in tests, but I don't think there's that much disparity. FTP tests and Strava (from the power curve) both put it at 250. I'd like to think that it's higher, but seeing as how I don't really make any efforts to raise it through training ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • I'm going to strong-arm the original retailer to get the thing fixed - which complicated by the fact that I bought it second hand, but we can hopefully / maybe work something out.

  • You cant compare average speeds at average Power if theres drafting involved. You're introducing something like a 35% deviation. Which is far more than the speeds deviate. So it becomes pointless.

    Just looking at a longish (10.5km) rolling segment I happened to ride last night.

    Group ride - 40,8 kph - 205w
    Solo - 32,0 kph - 213w

    (probably similar Wind conditions)

  • Clear the only way to settle this is for @Hoke and @dglshrn to have pursuit race. Loser to provide beers for me.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Power Meters / Powermeters (SRM, Powertap, Quarq, Ergomo, Vector, Stages, power2max, P2M, 4iii, InPower, Cinch)

Posted by Avatar for hippy @hippy

Actions