-
So all those other posts about a day ago where you were debating whether the media is biased against Corbyn with Velocio and co didn't happen right?
I love the take a stance, deny you made it then call people who disagree with it morons approach. And by the way: quoting things I said doesn't make them wrong, you have to disprove them. Which you've categorically failed to do.
-
So all those other posts about a day ago where you were debating whether the media is biased against Corbyn with Velocio and co didn't happen right?
Do you read? Here's a key part of what I said to DK:
Regardless of Corbyn, having a biased media is never a "meh" situation. What if the next guy or gal gets the same treatment? Is it their fault because they failed to win over Murdoch?
The discussion was about whether media bias is something worth worrying about, not whether the media was biased against Corbyn. That was what the report argued.
I called you a fucking moron because that's the impression I got from you posts (having just got home from the pub may have contributed as well, but having reread your posts I'm happy to stand by it).
Here are some highlights:
And you also claimed this:
Which didn't happen. I didn't criticize anyone (except you, for being a moron). What I did was post a link to a report which I thought people on this thread would find interesting and perhaps troubling.