You are reading a single comment by @Vince and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • @bertocq Thank you for your input - I have been reading through the thread but it is still too technical for me! Not just the dual-ovality but also the "5 positions".

    I ride 50/34 with an 11-28 cassette and spend most of my time in the UK on the 'big' ring and mid-cassette.

    I had a look online and I found another (french) company selling dual-oval chainrings:
    http://dual-oval.com/

    Prices are half way between Doval and Osymetric at £80 for a set.

    Their tech info is limited and looks like a copy/paste mash of other brands:

    ~Dual-Oval trays are made of Aluminum CNC T6 treatment.

    The concept and design are 100% French, they are formed at an oval twice as Osymétric (less pronounced anyway) and not as a simple oval rotor.

    The roundness of the Dual-Oval trays is similar to Osymetric trays or new Rotor QXL. However, Dual Oval trays are different from their twin oval design which creates a longer support (77 °), each pedal stroke is more efficient.

    The oval dual eliminates dead spots, compared to a simple oval is more progressive.

    When the dead come, the plate diameter gradually reduced and after gradually increasing.

    Dual-Oval trays allow to gain power, endurance and reduce joint stress on your joints.

    -Pédalage Rounder.

    -consumption Of lower O2.

    Reduces joint stress the knee.

    Reduces the production of lactic acid.

    Reduces heart rate.

    External shelves are adjustable in 3 positions micro OCP.

    It is recommended to try all positions and make your own judgment about which way you want. However, generally the riders who tend to have a high rate use more position 3 while the runners who have lower rates tend to use the position 1.
    ~

  • What is the question? Can't understand if you are advertising the dual-oval or asking for a comparison

About

Avatar for Vince @Vince started