OK, so whether people care about media bias against Corbyn specifically.
I accept there's a generalised group who care about bias in the media as a general group... but they don't care any more or less about whether that's for or against Corbyn.
Yes, what they care about is media bias full-stop. So they care when it happens regardless of it being Corbyn or not. So they also care when it is Corbyn. Surely that means they care?
Specific examples:
The organization which put together the report (Media Reform Coalition) was founded in 2011, before Corbyn came into power. Presumably they didn't create the organization as a front for some future in which Corbyn would come to power so they could then create this report.
The LSE department of Media and Communications is in now ways affiliated with Corbyn, but they also published a report.
Of course, you've already said:
there's a person behind that with an idea that stems from their personal "I want to say this to the world"... so it's not like that wasn't written by a pro-Corbynite.
Being provided with such a high, unfalsifiable, hurdle, I'm not sure I can provide evidence.
OK, so whether people care about media bias against Corbyn specifically.
Yes, what they care about is media bias full-stop. So they care when it happens regardless of it being Corbyn or not. So they also care when it is Corbyn. Surely that means they care?
Specific examples:
The organization which put together the report (Media Reform Coalition) was founded in 2011, before Corbyn came into power. Presumably they didn't create the organization as a front for some future in which Corbyn would come to power so they could then create this report.
The LSE department of Media and Communications is in now ways affiliated with Corbyn, but they also published a report.
Of course, you've already said:
Being provided with such a high, unfalsifiable, hurdle, I'm not sure I can provide evidence.