You are reading a single comment by @Velocio and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
You're patently wrong.
Really? Show me the proof.
I do think those who actively don't support Corbyn in this case are turning a blind eye, however.
Yup, they are. As they always have done, because you know... bears shit in woods, etc... it's not a new piece of information unique to this man, it's common knowledge since forever.
I cared about shifting the mean-point of the party farther to the left (pro-Corbyn). I don't care about this stupid pantomine (root cause Corbyn and his ineffective leadership) that is leaving Labour crippled at the time when they should be and need to be most effective in opposition.
Velocio
salmonchild
So there is a bias behind the report that says there is bias therefore the report should be dismissed because of the bias rather than the things which the reports says are biased?
That's not how academia, in my experience, works. And even were it to be the case that the primary was a supporter of Corbyn, the results should be verifiable.
You're patently wrong. I do think those who actively don't support Corbyn in this case are turning a blind eye, however.