-
so....you missed the point of the article then.
No, I got the article just fine. If you read my original post about it, I argue that there is no opaque structure, at least not on the 'evidence' presented. The paragraph of my post that h2o highlighted was merely in addition to all that.
And yes, because of the lack of evidence and/or research, the article was largely pointless.
-
If you read my original post about it, I argue that there is no opaque structure, at least not on the 'evidence' presented.
No, you argue that it doesn't matter that the structure is opaque because you assume there's not much money in it. You then also say it'd only be a story if he was pilfering. You're basically defining your own criteria for whether it's a story or not in a way that will fail your test. Straw man isn't quite the right term, but it's disingenuous.
so....you missed the point of the article then. It was more about an opaque structure and decision making at a 'grassroots' organisation. Not really the money.