You are reading a single comment by @dst2 and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
so....you missed the point of the article then.
No, I got the article just fine. If you read my original post about it, I argue that there is no opaque structure, at least not on the 'evidence' presented. The paragraph of my post that h2o highlighted was merely in addition to all that.
And yes, because of the lack of evidence and/or research, the article was largely pointless.
so....you missed the point of the article then. It was more about an opaque structure and decision making at a 'grassroots' organisation. Not really the money.