You are reading a single comment by @MrDrem and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
My understanding of the case is that its not about stopping article 50 being invoked, more about ensuring that its invoked correctly, and in line with our constitutional arrangements, which in this case are not straightforward.
Once we know how article 50 can be triggered, we can pull that trigger.
One of the big arguments for leave was re parliamentary sovereignty. Denying that to Parliament on something like article 50 (if that's where it should sit) seems a bad idea.
Clearing up if it is Parliament's decision before we are too late to fix things seems a good idea too.
What's the issue?
MrDrem
tell me dear remainers how is your Morgan Stanley / Goldman Sachs funded Mischon de Raya legal challenge to the invocation of art. 50 going? Obviously Morgan Stanley & Goldman must really care for the '99%' or for the apparent increasing state of social inequality in the UK...