mi7rennie-
I'd save £50 and buy a mju-i and get a round in.
I'll recommend this too, haven't got a mju ii but my mju i doesn't seem to be too bad for £15 i got it for.
Mju ii costs around £70+ unless you get a great bargain, but guessing would produce better/sharper pictures esp in low light. Would recommend the mju(i or ii) or xa(orig. or 2) as they are v small/portable and light.Pics from my mju ii using agfa vista 200:
-
I didn't recommend either, just explaining how each differ in relation to your intended use.
I've kept copies of both... so perhaps that's what I recommend... :)
The nikon might be slightly more pleasant to shoot with, maybe. I like the finder and the handling. But it's relatively big/heavy/indiscreet. You can get a mju 1 for £20 easily so that's perhaps what I would do.
tl:dr: Buy a mju-1 already.
You are reading a single comment by @mi7rennie and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Uoeno
miro_o
^ I think @ItkI nailed it. They both use IR and do a good job. A difference is the nikon shows in the finder whether or not you've hit the desired focus... and you can rate the ISO manually - handy if you want to use available light.
I'd save £50 and buy a mju-i and get a round in.