You are reading a single comment by and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Methodologically it's an interesting question. Try tweeting the authors? But I'm not sure how not reporting one paper could be considered bias. Explain? Assuming Times reporting is perfectly neutral it doesn't change the results from the other papers.

  • I didn't put much (any) work into checking the validity of the papers selected for the study but assumed that it would be by circulation (if you are analysing the printed media) and the fact that the Times wasn't listed raised a red flag.

    Just wondered if the papers listed were picked for their bias? Rather than for their relevance to British media as a whole.

About

Avatar for   started