Interesting. It appears to come down to whether the Parks Department granted a licence for vehicular access to the Parkland Walk.
I can't link to the documents directly, but if you scroll down to 'Decision Notice.pdf' and '3 Parkland Walk site meeting 20 June 2016.pdf', you can see that planning permission was granted and that the detail of granting vehicular access depended on that licence.
That may not be the end of it, of course, provided the applicants still have an appetite for legal action. I still think Haringey shouldn't have granted the original application in the first place.
Interesting. It appears to come down to whether the Parks Department granted a licence for vehicular access to the Parkland Walk.
I can't link to the documents directly, but if you scroll down to 'Decision Notice.pdf' and '3 Parkland Walk site meeting 20 June 2016.pdf', you can see that planning permission was granted and that the detail of granting vehicular access depended on that licence.
http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=288285
That may not be the end of it, of course, provided the applicants still have an appetite for legal action. I still think Haringey shouldn't have granted the original application in the first place.