-
• #19077
Yours for a mere £159
-
• #19078
WTF trainer drops...
-
• #19079
U can't make it up.
£159
Extra Butter.
-
• #19080
Hanon also have some choice Brooks over £100. 😀
-
• #19081
RIP trainer thread
-
• #19082
those Hanon Brooks are fucking shocking
-
• #19083
Wouldn't pay £160 for them, but they are kinda growing on me..
-
• #19084
You don't deserve eyes...
-
• #19085
If they were goth black you'd be all over them!
-
• #19086
Nope
-
• #19087
Definitely not wank
-
• #19088
Srs?
-
• #19089
No Srs were adidas . Referee shoes. With plugs.
-
• #19090
Not black enough... Would deffo wear all black Spiridons...
-
• #19091
Nike just improved a shoe
http://static.highsnobiety.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/14185050/Rochambeau-Nike-NYFWM-SS17-04.jpg
Only took a zillion retros
-
• #19092
yes please
-
• #19093
-
• #19094
Black Jordan V - £160
😂😂😂😂😂😳😒
-
• #19095
I've got mine reserved with staff discount.
-
• #19096
You mean you're paying for yours?!?
-
• #19097
Even with my discounts I'm still not paying 3 figures for a shoe that although ace BITD now looks like they were made by Jeremy Beadle
-
• #19098
So much whining about shoe prices. £160 is £85 in 1990. Considering it's a beadle collab, that's a bargain.
-
• #19099
Chapuka were basically shit and I paid £10 for mine and I still think I was ripped off
-
• #19100
On this subject, anyone got a Nike code pretty please?
Digging the new AF1 Q54 flyknits, but £125 is more than any sensible man should drop on AF1.
quality