Sorry guys, didn't mean to offend anyone (and definitely not @SeƱor_Bear ), I probably would have expressed myself in a better way in my mother tongue (less offending, I guess). I definitely don't "hate" this bike, on the contrary (I'm building a Supercorsa myself, albeit a 1996 frame). I was following this because I was in doubt how to finish mine: period correct or modern. I was/am "disappointed" because I see the Supercorsa as a real "Super Corsa" bike (= a racemachine with an agressive geometry) and I didn't find that in this bike (only because of the imo "strange" seatpost and stem position).
Why is is strange? I can't make my arms any longer or my legs any shorter so slamming the stem would just mean sitting on my bollocks for the duration of a ride.
It looked strange because stem height and seatpost length would suggest needing a larger frame. But if it fits you best this way, than this way it should be. Form and function, you know.
Sorry guys, didn't mean to offend anyone (and definitely not @SeƱor_Bear ), I probably would have expressed myself in a better way in my mother tongue (less offending, I guess). I definitely don't "hate" this bike, on the contrary (I'm building a Supercorsa myself, albeit a 1996 frame). I was following this because I was in doubt how to finish mine: period correct or modern. I was/am "disappointed" because I see the Supercorsa as a real "Super Corsa" bike (= a racemachine with an agressive geometry) and I didn't find that in this bike (only because of the imo "strange" seatpost and stem position).
Wim (the little money earning Cunt)