Just playing devils advocate. Given that everyone seems to believe that during times of financial instability the government should increase spending as a stimulus, doesn't it equally follow that the Blair/Brown government should have been easing off spending pre the crash?
On that basis regardless of Blair/Brown involvement in the causes of the crash is it not fair to attribute a large part of the deficit and it's associated costs to them?
Just playing devils advocate. Given that everyone seems to believe that during times of financial instability the government should increase spending as a stimulus, doesn't it equally follow that the Blair/Brown government should have been easing off spending pre the crash?
On that basis regardless of Blair/Brown involvement in the causes of the crash is it not fair to attribute a large part of the deficit and it's associated costs to them?