You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • standard, entry level neo-liberal stuffins to be fair. nothing wildly surprising for people that presumably like to quote ayn rand in their xmas cards.

  • You obviously have your view and it's immovable, but if you look around I think you'll find a strong "entry level neo-liberal" argument in support of maternity pay when used as a method to keep women in the working economy / return them to the working economy asap. The Torys actually had returning mothers to work as policy aim with the whole child care credits thing.

    On removing mat pay I think the rational is based on the impact that things such as mat pay have on very small businesses where it's not just a question of covering the extra cost, but the time cost involved in recruiting a temp replacement. Even decent sized businesses with HR departments can find recruitment a huge drain.

    Personally I'd argue for an increased mat pay subsidiary for business under a certain size. Especially as many small business will just not hire women likely to become pregnant anyway - so that may mitigate it... possibly. But trying to present it as an evil Tory scum argument is a bit simplistic I think.

About

Avatar for hugo7 @hugo7 started