You are reading a single comment by @The_Seldom_Killer and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • The only time when you can support an argument of safety in numbers is when the number of journeys being made by bicycle means that traffic density declines below motorised congestion levels.

    Why is that? Cycle numbers may increase while there are still motorised congestion levels -whatever you mean by that.

    Drivers awareness and better behaviour around riders and likelihood of riders in the environment could reduce incidents

  • Driver behaviour is the greatest cause of KSIs for all road users. Congestion exacerbates bad behaviour. This is actually observable pretty much anywhere, not just drivers on the road. Take a look at cyclists who come around the front of a group at a red light despite arriving later. Take a look at human behaviour when there's an evacuation in a crowded area. Take a look at skiers trying to get on a busy chair lift. It happens all the time. As soon as humans get into congestion conditions, a proportion of them will resort to self-interest and attempt to exploit opportunities accepting a compromise on safety, particularly the safety of others.

About