-
No it's not, but voting for a leader and movement who are never going to achieve power is.
It's like I said: the Labour party isn't a political plaything for the left wing. It's not a toy or a home for lost causes. It's supposed to be the main opposition party which is trying to get back into government. To do that it needs to be electable.
Corbyn should resign and let Labour appoint a leader who actually wants to be Prime Minister. Not doing so is selfish and prolonging his leadership is too.
Fox-
See, if you, and enough of the others vote for him, he will achieve power. So who's being selfish?
I'm against this "should be trying to get into government at whatever cost" nonsense, we'll just get the same swing back and forth. I want change.
As for the "Not wanting to be prime minister" I don't blame him, it's a horrible job, and if Rupert doesn't like you it's even worse! That doesn't mean he wouldn't do it, though. Afterall, he was reluctant to stand for Labour leader, but here he is....
Yukirin
Voting for a fairer system, better wealth distribution and better services is not selfish. Ridiculous statement.