You are reading a single comment by @William. and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Yes, unrelated like the two posts I was replying to. Sorry I'll try to be more clear in future :)
1) No, yours are presented as evidence of Corbyn being unelectable.
Mine are evidence that this is debatable.>
You mean I'm being a bit more assertive? Could be, might be why I edited my post and tried to find common ground, stop this getting repetitive.
2) Thing is, sometimes you have to take the world as you find it. We're not going to change the way the world reacts.
William.
The two things are unrelated. I'm not sure how the "Thing is" connects them. So:
1) No, yours are presented as evidence of Corbyn being unelectable.
Mine are evidence that this is debatable.
They are important distinctions. I accept that he may be unelectable. I also figure for something as oft repeated there would be fairly substantial data which show him to be an extreme outlier, rather than a spectrum of "not popular", "as popular", "more popular."
2) My point is that the world should care a bit less when a bigot is called a bigot.