-
The two things are unrelated. I'm not sure how the "Thing is" connects them. So:
1) No, yours are presented as evidence of Corbyn being unelectable.
Mine are evidence that this is debatable.
They are important distinctions. I accept that he may be unelectable. I also figure for something as oft repeated there would be fairly substantial data which show him to be an extreme outlier, rather than a spectrum of "not popular", "as popular", "more popular."
2) My point is that the world should care a bit less when a bigot is called a bigot.
Ha, potentially the highest approval rating for any politician in the UK right now!