You are reading a single comment by @William. and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I think that (2nd) paragraph is a bit ill fitting as well, but it is directly linked to Johnson's comments:

    Writing in Monday's Daily Telegraph, Mr Johnson dismissed Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon's call for a second independence referendum saying there was little "appetite" for one.

    The next two paragraphs - not so much.

    I'm not asking for positive articles about Corbyn. I'm trying to point out why some people would recognize hostility to him in the media after you posted:

    You can't trust the BBC, they've had it in for Corbyn from the start. They're basically a mouthpiece for the tories. If you watch his speeches on ITV he's actually a really eloquent, exciting, convincing orator.

    But maybe you're right. Maybe that's a perfectly normal way of starting breaking news about a different topic, but I've just got heightened awareness of it.

  • Do you think the BBC broadcast disproportionately favourable stories about leaders of other parties, in contrast to the negative ones about Corbyn? I haven't noticed them being much kinder to Cameron.

    Ed Milliband got an appalling time in the press, but I quite liked him. I don't think I've been brainwashed to find Corbyn uninspiring.

  • Do you think the BBC broadcast disproportionately favourable stories about leaders of other parties, in contrast to the negative ones about Corbyn? I haven't noticed them being much kinder to Cameron.

    I don't know. There are NGOs that try to quantify these things, so maybe there is data. However, it would be interesting to know how often Cameron is/was the lead on an unrelated story.

  • The Media Reform Coalition analysed nearly 500 pieces across eight national newspapers, including The Sun, The Times, Guardian and Daily Mail, and found 60% of their articles were ‘negative’, meaning they were openly hostile or expressed animosity or ridicule.

    Out of the 494 articles across the papers during Corbyn’s first seven days at leader, 60% (296 articles) were negative, with only 13% positive stories (65 articles) and 27% taking a “neutral” stance (133 articles), the report says.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/11/26/jeremy-corbyn-media-coverage_n_8653886.html

    Over the weekend the BBC’s former political editor confessed — in an interview in the Sunday Times — that he had written to several BBC colleagues over concerns that the corporation’s political coverage is biased against Jeremy Corbyn. When asked by Lynn Barber whether he was ‘shocked’ by the way the BBC ‘rubbish Jeremy Corbyn’, Robinson replied ‘yes’

    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/11/nick-robinson-tackles-anti-corbyn-bias-at-the-bbc/

    The BBC may have bowed to political pressure to show bias against Labour and Jeremy Corbyn, a former chair of the BBC Trust has said.

    Sir Michael Lyons, who chaired the trust from 2007 to 2011 and is a former Labour councillor, claimed that there had been “some quite extraordinary attacks on the elected leader of the Labour party”.

    He told the BBC’s The World at One: “I can understand why people are worried about whether some of the most senior editorial voices in the BBC have lost their impartiality on this.

    http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/may/12/bbc-bias-labour-sir-michael-lyons

    And you're right - Milliband got it pretty bad as well. In some ways worse.

    And I never claimed you, or anyone else, had been brainwashed to find Corbyn uninspiring.

About

Avatar for William. @William. started