You are reading a single comment by @gbj_tester and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I can see why Cervelo wouldn't have taken any account of fixed TTs, but what's PX's excuse for leaving out the fork crown drilling? No stack and reach numbers in the geometry chart is tiresomely amateurish too, but it looks like they have copied the head tube and top tube lengths straight from Cervelo, but with a 25mm higher BB. The fit triangle should be even longer and lower then the T3/T4, but with the rider an extra inch off the ground. I wonder if it's still faster than a T4 once you put a rider and some handlebars on it.
gbj_tester
Bold claims here by PX - claiming their new carbon track frame's faster than a T4...