As I understand it, Cliff Richard has not been cleared of anything, nor has he been arrested or charged. The CPS has decided there is insufficient evidence to prosecute.
Police have not apologised for investigating his alleged involvement in historical crimes nor do they ever.
On what basis does he expect to successfully sue the BBC over the coverage of the police search of his home in Berkshire?
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
As I understand it, Cliff Richard has not been cleared of anything, nor has he been arrested or charged. The CPS has decided there is insufficient evidence to prosecute.
Police have not apologised for investigating his alleged involvement in historical crimes nor do they ever.
On what basis does he expect to successfully sue the BBC over the coverage of the police search of his home in Berkshire?