• I'm stuck in between, it's no doubt we should not be a part of the EU because of their ludicrous laws to control masses of people, and their import and export 'middle man' service which charges us a lot for products that usually would be cheaper. It is more the debate whether or not we should leave the other countries in the EU to be fucked over in order to save ourselves. Rather than a quick escape we should look towards 'overthrowing' the EU and all the fuckerys that go on in Brussels.

  • Now that's a good question. First of all, we should be looking to get rid of the dead wood that only turns up to 1 out of 42 meetings for a committee that they are part of. You know, the likes of Farage.

    If we aren't benefiting from the EU, shouldn't we be looking at who does and considering their model?

  • That's true, my argument to stay is that even though the EU restricts our 'democratic model', theres nothing to prove that a tory government will relieve us of any of the issues we have while we remain in the EU.

    And rather than changing our policies and our political model we could quite easily just leave the EU and not have to alter anything else, but this brings me back to another point on whether our democratic model will actually be beneficial for the people or simply just a smaller scale version of the EU's power hierarchy?

    In conclusion I feel that theres no doubt the EU is corrupt and causing not much else but issues for the countries within it, but if we leave that is only solving the problem for us, and we need to think on a larger scale not just about our tiny country!

About