You are reading a single comment by @NotThamesWater and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Well we all know where their morals are !

    They don't have morals, they have a legal obligation to maximise shareholder value. She still generates money for them even with the doping conviction.

  • they have a legal obligation to maximise shareholder value

    Not sure they do, which would meant that any decision to maximise shareholder value in this manner is their choice.

  • Not sure they do

    Well, they have a fiduciary duty to act in the interests of the shareholders. It is up to the shareholders to instruct the directors about their interests, but in most cases maximising value is at the top of the list.

About