You are reading a single comment by @The_Kindness_of_Trees and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
You are completely missing/avoiding my points.
1 - Let's assume the new substance was a natural plant extract - or crisps.
2 - Not all Religions have the same view, so why is one view any more valid than the next?
3 - See my reply to uber-gruber. The ethics of reciprocity is all that really counts, so if you're not forcing harm on others....
The_Kindness_of_Trees
andyp
No, I was talking of your hypothetical drug and how the WADA rules ban such things already.