Bike porn

Posted on
Page
of 4,156
First Prev
/ 4,156
Last Next
  • weird... "Member since Apr 2013"

  • maybe just transitioning to zygote stage?

  • ?????? sorry guys.......something wrong ??

  • Yes, it is frowned upon when posting your own bikes in bike porn thread

  • ohhh, ok Scorch....my bad, thanks for the heads up.

  • Check the thread a bit, read back a few pages and you'll know why this isn't porn.

  • Looks like the wickerman set as well.

  • the wickerman is just out of shot !!!...............ready for the next burning

  • think Scorch covered it thanks vp1337...........................just thought porn was selective to individual taste?

  • This is amaze.

  • I think this is properly ace. From burls' facebook

    https://www.facebook.com/Burls-Bikes-125466027489386/


    1 Attachment

    • image.jpg
  • thought porn was selective to individual taste?

    It is, but you don't have any :-)

    Posting your own bike just makes things worse, as you obviously have a much higher regard for them than a dispassionate observer would. That's why we call them readers' wives.

  • It is, but you don't have any :-)
    surely you contradict yourself with that statement ?.....just because your taste is different to mine.....I think classic road frames with risers on look ridiculous !! but some peeps seem to love them, and spend their hard earned on them ( fair play to them ).I don't have "higher regard" for my own bikes..( have sold on two of them)...I lust after a lot of the bikes I see on here..but sadly don't have the funds for them.

  • classic road frames with risers don't get a pass in this thread either

  • I know withered preacher.......I was trying to put the point of one persons idea of taste to anothers......

  • I know, isn't this fun?

  • it sure is......better than looking at what peeps have had for their tea on facebook

  • Would! Especially with less brakes

  • surely you contradict yourself with that statement ?

    Not really. Even when I don't like a particular bike which somebody posts in this thread (and that's the majority of them), I don't feel the need to comment as long as I can see why a person with some taste might think they belong here.

    If you read enough of this thread, you'll see that aesthetic relativism is widely deprecated; the regulars are a bunch of Kantians

  • again I have to pull you up on your statement "I don't feel the need to comment as long as I can see why a person with some taste might think they belong here"
    That's merely what I did.....? just because you assume you have better taste than myself you chose to comment..Kantiansism or not , surely it would be wiser rather than to deprecate to educate

  • Is this the right room for an argument?

  • its not an argument campervangogh. its purely a discussion between a Kantian, and a Luddite

  • That's merely what I did.....?

    No, you posted a bunch of bikes which no sane person would have placed in the category "Bike Porn". Consider yourself educated.

  • Oh I'm sorry, is this a five minute argument, or the full half hour?

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Bike porn

Posted by Avatar for Velocio @Velocio

Actions