-
• #4227
I still havent tested my POCs. The UV spectrometer here does look like it'd fit a lens or even the full sunglasses.
I can check for both visable and UV transmittance. I'm guessing I want the UV to be a bit
lower than the vis.The fit is great though. And as they sit high, you get a frameless view. I really hate having sunglass frames in my Field of vision when cycling.
-
• #4228
Ah no, thats annoying, both mine are fine. They also came in under a week and each was in its own polysterine box.
-
• #4229
Looks good, the temptation grows...
-
• #4230
cheers
-
• #4231
agreed on the field of view. loads of space to the sides. feels like i am wearing nothing at all.
large lenses minimise wind-eye contact and therefore hayfever too
-
• #4232
Here's a picture, not a great one. They're from aliexpress but they've since been removed from sale (by that seller). They were a tenner or so. They seem fine, quality-wise, at least as good as my knock-off Oakleys. Although I haven't used them yet.
-
• #4233
weird, mine arrived this morning!
-
• #4234
I ordered some last week - how long did they take to arrive?
-
• #4235
As an addendum to my last, I wore these this morning. I'm sure I looked an absolute twat, but they covered my eyes well and the lenses seem good quality. One of them is a polarised lens and when I tried it last night, at 90 deg to my TV it blocks the light from it. Cool stuff!
Here's the aliexpress link.
-
• #4236
So are people with fake glasses replacing the lenses with real ones if they like the shape?
-
• #4237
im not
-
• #4238
Isn't the (rather strong) possibility that they're exactly the same as the 'real' ones?
-
• #4239
When I worked at Net a Porter, I remember a story of some Burberry thing being returned - it had Dorothy Perkins labels sewn in it. Ok, I'm not suggesting Burberry use the same materials as Dotty P, but the skills and workforce are the same.
If - and of course it's a big if - but if the fake POCs come from the same place as the legit ones, then they could well be more or less identical. -
• #4240
I'd wouldn't have thought so.
As a seller of fake goods why wouldn't you make the extra margin by using the cheapest materials possible?
-
• #4241
and @Smallfurry Out of interest do yours have all the writing on the inside of the left arm?
Ie the Lenses by Carl Zeiss, etc.
-
• #4242
I'd assume you go down the easiest route - if the materials and parts are there in the same factory, you would just do that. It's a few bits of plastic really. No idea how good the lenses are or aren't on the real ones.
-
• #4243
@hugo7 nope, using the fake lenses.
@bashthebox I bought a pair of fake Oakley radars a while ago. A colleague has the real thing. We compared them and the real ones are a bit lighter, look a bit tidier and generally were more of a professional product.
The POCs feel better, but still a bit cheap, bit of swarf/excess plastic to peel off on one bit. Lenses fit pretty well though and I'm never going to fork out £160 on a pair of sunglasses so I'm happy with looking like a tit for a tenner. :)
If they broke or weren't available, I'd go back to my £12 bloc glasses.
Edit: @hugo7 yes it does say lens by carl zeiss and Blade DO.
-
• #4244
Fair enough. Well as I mentioned, mine should get here soonish. And like you, fuck paying £160 for glasses that I drop twice every ride.
-
• #4245
I've said it before but the main difference is the quality of the lenses. Fake ones are in a whole different league.
I've got some Bloc Titan's at the moment and they're still pretty cheap but the optics are just as good as the real Oakleys I've used.
-
• #4246
Gotta call bullshit on the 'whole different league', at least in the case of oakley vs foakley (IMO, anecdotal, n=2, etc...). There are differences in the lenses (thickness and scratch resistance being the most notable, minor optical differences if you're really looking), but they are no worse than any other £10-15 pair of sunglasses and definitely not ~10 times worse, the price of oakleys implies.
-
• #4247
You're welcome to call bullshit, it's just my experience. I've had 4 or 5 pairs of fake Oakleys now and I've given up on them, the lenses are so bad you may as well buy cheap sunglasses from a decent brand.
By bad I mean the depth of field changes around the lense, they scratch easily, they glare easily and they actually become harder to see with when in bright light.
-
• #4248
Carl Zeiss
Yeah.
-
• #4249
Probably more true if you never wear them over the eyes.
-
• #4250
Again IMO, anecdotal, n=2, etc... being the major point. Had 2 real vs 2 fake. I know which I won't be buying ever again.
Pictures? Link? And what is / are the lenses like?