You are reading a single comment by @Sig_Arlecchino and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Just as for real porn, a definition for bikeporn, as applied consistently by this noble board, is not entirely subjective. It should be noted that the exercise of determining whether something qualifies as porn or not does indeed involve a subjective component. However, this subjective component should be understood as a margin of discretion which is clearly circumscribed by a common understanding of what constitutes a tasteful bike.
To put it in the words of Associate Supreme Justice Potter Stewart:
[I can't define what is pornography.] "But I know it when I see it."
in Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964)
Sig_Arlecchino
10293
.