Not a lot of journalistic effort made around the point that he already had asylum in Italy. Not that I don't think he should have been offered at least some leave to remain in the UK. However, the story seems a little unbalanced without further examination as to why the decision was made to refuse his application. What actually is the root cause of the tragedy being reported here?
The policy is that asylum seekers must seek asylum in the country where they first reach Europe. He thought that, having been a translator for the British, the UK might help him instead of applying that rule dogmatically. The UK applied the rule dogmatically.
Not a lot of journalistic effort made around the point that he already had asylum in Italy. Not that I don't think he should have been offered at least some leave to remain in the UK. However, the story seems a little unbalanced without further examination as to why the decision was made to refuse his application. What actually is the root cause of the tragedy being reported here?