We can keep arguing but it was already reported that the UCI aren't suspending him so presumably they're happy with whatever details make up the explanation.
They haven't provisionally suspended him, because their rule book says they don't provisionally suspend people for terbutaline doping. What they decide about his explanation is to come, and is not relevant to the case administration in the period between the adverse analytical finding and the hearing at which his culpability will be judged and his punishment decided.
They haven't provisionally suspended him, because their rule book says they don't provisionally suspend people for terbutaline doping. What they decide about his explanation is to come, and is not relevant to the case administration in the period between the adverse analytical finding and the hearing at which his culpability will be judged and his punishment decided.