You are reading a single comment by @gbj_tester and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
We can keep arguing but it was already reported that the UCI aren't suspending him so presumably they're happy with whatever details make up the explanation.
They haven't provisionally suspended him, because their rule book says they don't provisionally suspend people for terbutaline doping. What they decide about his explanation is to come, and is not relevant to the case administration in the period between the adverse analytical finding and the hearing at which his culpability will be judged and his punishment decided.
gbj_tester
hippy
Maybe it was an emergency TUE. Maybe it was an existing TUE that had expired and was going to be renewed by the OGE doc.
We can keep arguing but it was already reported that the UCI aren't suspending him so presumably they're happy with whatever details make up the explanation.