-
• #18977
I love you, Iain, but you may have the worst taste of anyone I know...
And you don't know about sexy sailors in denim...
-
• #18978
The Royal Oak is one style that I genuinely can't get my head around. I can normally see some appeal to watches that I don't like but the Royal Oak just baffles me.
-
• #18979
Even the less busy dials for that matter.
Maybe you need to see it in the flesh?
-
• #18980
Nah, I think the price point under a grand is quite tricky. You either get obscure brands or bad quality / design.
I thought this was passable.
-
• #18981
Anything by Steinhart, job done... Easy fucking peasy...
-
• #18982
I'm actually thinking about buying a regular Ocean One, it may be all I need to get rid of the pesky Submariner itch...
-
• #18983
Finished servicing my first watch (a Smiths Astral). Went from non-running to performing rather well.
1 Attachment
-
• #18984
Clearly a spare brake lever on the side
-
• #18985
Good for you!
-
• #18986
...you may have the worst taste of anyone I know...
This is a fairly bold statement to start the day with.
-
• #18987
It's 6pm, I can say what I want...
-
• #18988
...and have a tramp juice!
-
• #18989
I've already opened a very cheeky little Shiraz!
-
• #18990
Good effort, fella.
-
• #18991
Just found this thread and its not doing my work to-do list any good.
Question for the watch experts - I have had this watch in a drawer for years but know nothing about it apart from the fact its a Seiko. Its an automatic and says 21 jewels on the dial. Does anyone know the era (I'm assuming 70@s by the design) or anything else of note?
It needs a service as it looses a bit of time through the day.
1 Attachment
-
• #18992
I already called bad design. :oP
-
• #18993
Its a Seiko 5 "TV-screen".
It has a 6119 movement (http://www.christophlorenz.de/watch/movements/s/seiko/seiko_6119a.php?l=en)
-
• #18994
Here's a bit more info http://www.watchsleuth.com/seiko5finder/search/?MOD=6119-5401
-
• #18995
Excellent - thanks for the quick confirmation.
Quite impressive that something from potentially the late 1960's still works without any TLC.
-
• #18996
I mostly agree, lots of them look absolutely crap
Having seen this one in the flesh though, I wouldn't say no -
• #18997
I'm not following...
-
• #18998
I said before not a fan of Steinhart. I know the quality is there.
Just not the style imo.
-
• #18999
Steinhart knock it out of the park... Some great models, a great price point, Swiss 'made', ETA movements... You'd be a fool not to...
they all look a bit tacky. too cluttered.
maybe my taste though.