How can you possibly know the inner working's of someone else's mind?
Various ways. In this case we're inferring from a particular deviation from the actions of an ideal observer.
Your point about "wrong think" (Argumentum ad populum) and internet mobs are really just a massive whinge. People are arguing against you not just because they think you're wrong, but because you maintain a pig-headed insistence on the validity of your views despite having absolutely fuck all to support them, as your recourse to name calling and appeals to ignorance show.
It's pretty clear at this point that you've given up what little substance there was in your arguments and have resorted to whining victimhood to try to prove your point (whatever it was). Anything you had to say that was actually relevant was dealt with a few pages back.
Various ways. In this case we're inferring from a particular deviation from the actions of an ideal observer.
Your point about "wrong think" (Argumentum ad populum) and internet mobs are really just a massive whinge. People are arguing against you not just because they think you're wrong, but because you maintain a pig-headed insistence on the validity of your views despite having absolutely fuck all to support them, as your recourse to name calling and appeals to ignorance show.
It's pretty clear at this point that you've given up what little substance there was in your arguments and have resorted to whining victimhood to try to prove your point (whatever it was). Anything you had to say that was actually relevant was dealt with a few pages back.