Are you telling me 31 is massively more dangerous than 30. If so you are a fucking idiot.
And 32 isn't massively more dangerous than 31...
And 33 isn't massively more dangerous than 32...
And 34 isn't massively more dangerous than 33...
...
And 85 isn't massively more dangerous than 84...
So why don't we just let everyone drive at whatever speed they think is ok, because of course just being in a car implies that you are perfect at judging what is and isn't safe. All limits are arbitrary, but we have to draw the line somewhere. Again, what is your justification for driving slightly over the limit, and so increasing the danger to everyone, rather than slightly below?
Mate - give up. I don't know what your angle is here or who you're trying to defend but I don't think a thread on a cycling forum about drivers negligently killing cyclists is the place to do it.
And 32 isn't massively more dangerous than 31...
And 33 isn't massively more dangerous than 32...
And 34 isn't massively more dangerous than 33...
...
And 85 isn't massively more dangerous than 84...
EDIT: nod to @spiderpie
So why don't we just let everyone drive at whatever speed they think is ok, because of course just being in a car implies that you are perfect at judging what is and isn't safe. All limits are arbitrary, but we have to draw the line somewhere. Again, what is your justification for driving slightly over the limit, and so increasing the danger to everyone, rather than slightly below?