You are reading a single comment by and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Not in legal terms they're not. One is a crime, the other not. The distinction is important.

  • Consequentially, absolutely. That is, if you're happily immoral, but don't want to risk going to jail.

    One could easily make an argument that morally they're the same thing. In fact, I think both Cameron and Osborne did just that.

  • No argument from me on the moral side of things. But I'd be in hot water if I wrote for publication that someone had evaded taxes when they'd only avoided them - easy grounds for a defamation suit.

  • Exactly. Knew a proper philosopher would get the point.

    Maybe I needed to be clearer, morally evasion and avoidance are synonyms.

  • I agree they have said that. But leaving out what they said (barefaced).

    Isn't tax evasion always immoral, but tax avoidance a sliding scale, where at one end it's an ISA at your regular bank, and the other it's no different *except for the legality bit* to evasion?

    Some forms of tax avoidance could be seen as simply paying as much tax as you should no less but certainly no more.

About

Avatar for   started